Brian, how much does a babysitter cost nowadays in Sydney and how much time
would you need ;-)

Gerard


2013/2/16 <[email protected]>

> Hi all,****
>
> ** **
>
> I run DP on Win7Pro 64bit, using VMWare Player. It easy to do, and you get
> great performance if you use say Windows 98SE as the Guest operating
> system.  You can of course use Win 7 32Bit as the Guest operating system
> but that’s a lot of overhead to run a DOS app that itself can easily fit a
> floppy diskette if anyone could ever find one of those relics from the
> past. ****
>
> ** **
>
> I have also had reasonable success with running FreeDOS/PCDOS and MSDOS as
> the guest operating system, but there a few hurdles to overcome.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> Firstly you  need to create a VM Machine and hard drive and leave it
> empty. ****
>
> Then you have to create a DOS bootable virtual floppy boot disk, (I am
> trying to think what software I used for that), but you can tell VMWare to
> use this “floppy diskette image”, and its bidirectional, you can read and
> write to the virtual image from within VMWare. You need to configure the VM
> to use this image as its floppy diskette (You can do the same thing with
> CD-ROM or ISO images, but since you need to install drivers into DOS to
> read the CD-ROM it is something of a Catch-22, you can add CD-ROM support
> later in the configuration)****
>
> ** **
>
> I should add that the Virtual Floppy  Diskette image must contain not just
> the boot files, but also you will probably need utilities like Format.com,
> MSCDEX.EXE, XCOPY, etc etc, whatever you can fit into 1.44Mb (I have never
> gotten the 2.88Mb Floppy image VMWare supports to work)****
>
> ** **
>
> The next hurdle is to get VMWare to boot this floppy, normally it will
> want to boot from the virtual hard drive you originally create, and the
> damn things runs so fast that you can’t press the F2 or F12 key to
> configure create a boot sequence so that it tries to boot from the floppy
> first. If you insert “bios.bootDelay = "5000"“ as a line in the VM’s VMX
> file then you will get a 5 second (5000 milliseconds) window of opportunity
> to get to the F12 key to choose to boot from floppy. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Ok, so here you are. Probably looking at a very familiar screen (for older
> members) where you are asked to enter today’s time and date, followed by
> another familiar C:\>  It all becomes very nostalgic.****
>
> ** **
>
> So then you have to do some work. The next thing to test your memory and
> internet researching abilities is to set up the autoexec.bat and config.sys
> so that you can configure the DOS memory, HIMEM UMB, Files and Buffers (you
> need these to get DP to work, a minimum of 40 files). (DO NOT be tempted to
> load SHARE, it was never much use anyway). You also need to add the Driver
> for the CDROM and parameters into the config.sys, and MSCDEX and its
> parameters into the autoexec.bat. ****
>
> ** **
>
> But once you have that you have a virtual machine that boots up (and very
> quickly if you remove or change the bios.bootDelay parameter, and get to a
> comfortable C:\> in no time flat, unless you left the boot sequence to
> Floppy diskette and still have the image in.****
>
> ** **
>
> Ok now to whet your appetite you will need to get DP and say a DP
> application on there. You can access shares, USB sticks. Floppies are just
> a little slow, because you cannot change the virtual floppy, so you could
> repetitively reboot the VM incrementally and copy fragments from
> incrementally created floppy images. I chose to put a large app and the DP
> files onto an CD ISO image, using WinImage (I think) as the creator. Then
> XCOPY’d (if you remembered to install it and set the PATH so your dos
> utilities), into a new folder. You can use the internal COPY command, but
> my app had folders to contend with so XCOPY is far less of a headache.****
>
> ** **
>
> Fire up DP and watch it fly. ****
>
> ** **
>
> But, now the really difficult part starts. Its one things to have DP
> working on a Virtual Machine island but to interact with the real world is
> more difficult. First you need to install a network device driver then
> TCP/IP stack, and then an MS NET Client or similar on top. There are many
> of these.  Then you have to tweak it to access shares (remember that DOS
> will not connect to a share not in 8.3 name format. Also the Host needs
> some registry changes to allow the type of authentication that the early
> DOS network clients used, and then you need to set us shares for the
> printers, and redirect LPT1, to use one of these shares. I got it working
> some time ago, and I was pleased with how it worked, but it was way too
> much work.  ****
>
> ** **
>
> The Win98SE alternatively works wonderfully, and you do not have to worry
> about Windows activation like with later versions, so you can keep multiple
> versions of your appliance (remembering of course Microsoft’s licencing
> arrangements J) printing works fine, I imagine things like DPSpool etc will
> also work. Antiviruses are a problem since there are not too many now for
> Win 98, but if you only ever use it for DP then its probably not much of a
> worry.  By using a more lightweight Guest OS, there are few demands on late
> model hardware so you will probably see Win98 work at speeds you never
> thought possible. Sharing files either direction etc is also so much
> easier. ****
>
> ** **
>
> If I ever have time, and that’s rare with two kids around the house, and
> if I can make a pre-made appliance which does not breach Microsoft
> licencing I will upload one so anyone can use it.****
>
> ** **
>
> Bye****
>
> Brian****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Gerard van Loenhout
> *Sent:* Saturday, 16 February 2013 7:31 AM
> *To:* Jon Ong
> *Cc:* Dataperfect Users Discussion Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Dataperf] Screen size win7/32****
>
> ** **
>
> Jon, I find dosbox a bit too slow building up, especially with data from
> links.****
>
> And we are 5 people using it on a network, that's why I chose not to use
> dosbox.****
>
> ** **
>
> But I guess a relaxed person like you ;-) would probably be okay with
> dosbox. You can always try it. It's free.****
>
> ** **
>
> I know other people that are happy with dosbox on Win7/64.****
>
> ** **
>
> Gerard ****
>
> ** **
>
> 2013/2/15 Jong <[email protected]>****
>
> Gerard, Geert & Tim:****
>
>  ****
>
> Really nice to get continued support for our DP dinosaur from the gang.
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> I've considered switching to Access or other databases but I still believe
> simple is better, especially with complex data sets that I deal with in a
> medical practice.****
>
>  ****
>
> Full screen really only a concern for the portable netbooks I have to
> carry around at work, I realize that's not too much of an issue on the big
> screen.****
>
>  ****
>
> From what I've seen so far, someone (excuse me for forgetting who it was)
> said win7/32 pro allowed XP emulation with full screen so it looks like
> that's the easiest way to go for me.  ****
>
>  ****
>
> As for win7/64, (which unfortunatley I have on one of my laptops), it
> looks like best solution is creating a virtual PC using VMware and then
> WinXP -- lots of work there.****
>
>  ****
>
> Jon****
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* Gerard van Loenhout [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, February 15, 2013 12:26 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* [email protected]; Dataperfect Users Discussion Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Dataperf] DOS in Win 7/64 questions****
>
> Hi Jong! ****
>
> ** **
>
> I use DP Win7 / 32 Home. The window is not bigger than the dosbox in XP.**
> **
>
> I find it quite comfortable to work with. ****
>
> With these big screens nowadays I haven't actually tried fullscreen.****
>
> ** **
>
> Geert probably knows more.****
>
> ** **
>
> Gerard ****
>
> ** **
>
> 2013/2/14 Jong <[email protected]>****
>
> Geert & everyone:
>
> Thanks for the latest info on Dp in Win7/32, just a few clarifiers:
>
> 1.  Do you have pro or home version Win7/32?
> 2.  Does DP run in full screen mode?
> 3.  How do you print up your HTML output from DP?
> 4.  Is there a print spooler we can use similar to DP Spool to make
> printing
> seamless?
>
> Jon****
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 6:49 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Dataperf] DOS in Win 7/64 questions
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I can only agree with Gerard : I am running DP 'straight out of the box'
> without any problem on a Win7/32 system. NB: I don't even use Tame !
>
> All my reports are saved into html-files, which solves all possible
> printing problems...
>
> Regards,
> Geert.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:03:25 +0100, Gerard van Loenhout
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Don, I was the one who started the most recent discussion about Win7.
> > DosBox is too slow. I bought a couple of Win7/64 PCs at Dell. I bought
> > a CD from them with Win7/32 for the same PCs so I had the right
> > drivers. Now DP works fine.
>
> > 2013/2/12 Don Friedman <[email protected]>
> >> I know that there has been discussion about this but I can't seem to
> >> find
> >> a way to search it out on the main site. Is their a trick to that?
> >> I've finally "grown up" and put a couple of Win7/64 boxes in the office.
> >> I'm assuming that I can run dosbox to run DP without much trouble - I
> >> never
> >> have a need to print from DP and if I remember right that was part of
> >> the
> >> problem. Am I on the right track here? I'm assuming that it will still
> >> be
> >> faster to run DP via dosbox on my newer machines than to run them on my
> >> older XP machine.
> >> Don
> >> --
> >> *Don Friedman
> >> ProfessionalRecords.Com LLC
> >> PRS Data Systems
> >> Liveport WiFi*
> _______________________________________________
> Dataperf mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dataperf mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dataperf mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
>
>
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf

Reply via email to