datetime-sig  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Chris Barker - NOAA Federal
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Chris Barker
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Chris Barker
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Chris Barker
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Isaac J Schwabacher
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Chris Angelico
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Another round on error-checking Alexander Belopolsky
• [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495: Conversion from naive to aware Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP 495: Conversion from naive to aware Guido van Rossum
• [Datetime-SIG] A local timezone class Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] A local timezone class Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] A local timezone class Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] A local timezone class Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] A local timezone class Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] A local timezone class Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] A local timezone class Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] A local timezone class Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] A local timezone class Guido van Rossum
• [Datetime-SIG] Slightly better name for fold? jon
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Slightly better name for fold? Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Slightly better name for fold? Alexander Belopolsky
• [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Akira Li
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] DST explained visually Guido van Rossum
• [Datetime-SIG] The name of the UTC timezone Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] The name of the UTC timezone Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] The name of the UTC timezone Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] The name of the UTC timezone Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] The name of the UTC timezone Tim Peters
• [Datetime-SIG] Strict Invalid Time Checking: an idea for another PEP Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Strict Invalid Time Checking: an idea for another PEP Carl Meyer
• Re: [Datetime-SIG] time module issues Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] how does PEP-495 help improve dateutil, pytz timezone packages? Akira Li
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] how does PEP-495 help improve dateutil, pytz timezone packages? Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] how does PEP-495 help improve dateutil, pytz timezone packages? Akira Li
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] how does PEP-495 help improve dateutil, pytz timezone packages? Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] how does PEP-495 help improve dateutil, pytz timezone packages? Akira Li
• [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Stuart Bishop
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Stuart Bishop
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Stuart Bishop
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Akira Li
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] PEP-495 - Strict Invalid Time Checking Guido van Rossum
• Re: [Datetime-SIG] Post-PEP 495 ideas Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
• [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Guido van Rossum
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Carl Meyer
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Conversion vs arithmetic (was Re: Is EDT a timezone? Was: PEP-0500) ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
• Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Alexander Belopolsky
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 Ethan Furman
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] pytz vs. PEP 495 Was: PEP-431/495 ISAAC J SCHWABACHER
• [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Tim Peters
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Stuart Bishop
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Chris Angelico
  • Re: [Datetime-SIG] Implementing tzinfo for all valid datetimes (was Re: PEP-431/495) Tim Peters

• Earlier messages
• Later messages