On Saturday, October 19, 2002, at 06:44 AM, Thomas A. Lowery wrote:
It's important to not splinter the DBI Drivers development. In the past,I'm down with that. ;-)
Tim Bunce has discouraged alternate development lists in favor of using
dbi-dev. I agree with this. It helps to see the history of how a driver
change affects the DBI spec, since the need of one driver may truly be
the need of many drivers (begin_work, ping, meta data).
Bruce, would you be willing to join the dbi-dev list? It's a relatively low traffic list, since most discussion takes place on the dbi-users list.
Regards,
David
--
David Wheeler AIM: dwTheory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 15726394
http://david.wheeler.net/ Yahoo!: dew7e
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
