I think the issue is that headers are not someone thinks about when they are looking at a message, at least not your average person. They look at the message, and the basics that are provided (who, date, subject). The important things.
Perhaps a 2 line footer at the end of messages is the way to go, perhaps not. --K On 12/6/2001 at 9:30 PM Brett W. McCoy wrote: #On Thu, 6 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # #> If the subscriber is using with a MicroSloth environment #(Outlook/Exchange), #> s/he does not see that information. I was not even aware it was there #until #> you pointed it out because I subscribe to the list at work, where #microsloth #> is universal for office automation. # #Surely Outlook has a way of letting you view message headers? I think #under the view menu it has an option for showing headers. I normally #don't have my headers showing either (Pine has a similar feature letting #you view headers if you need to) -- I just happened to know that any #decent mailing list software puts that information in the headers. Some #mailers (like Pine) will also detect those fields and display them for you #at the end of each message. # #-- Brett # http://www.chapelperilous.net/ #------------------------------------------------------------------------ #Your mode of life will be changed to EBCDIC. -- Ken Speich Isn't having a smoking section in a [EMAIL PROTECTED] restaurant like having a peeing http://www.csh.rit.edu/~kenny section in a swimming pool?
