On Sonntag, 3. Juni 2007 Charles Marcus wrote: > The problem is not how much it costs to process a single message/file > - but how much it costs to be able to process *lots* of such messages > at the same time.
If a user wants to send a DVD per e-mail, what's the difference in sending it at once, or splitting it up in N parts, to fulfill whatever a single mail size restriction is? Big files are for sure less problematic than small ones, e.g. for big files you can skip SPAM processing. It's just one connection which is open a little bit longer, and it's only about copying bytes. No real processing power required for that. If you'd tell me that *mail clients* have problem with big files, I agree. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0676/846 914 666 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: EA39 8918 EDFF 0A68 ACFB 11B7 BA2D 060F 1C6F E6B0 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 1C6FE6B0
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
