I have a code that is an extension of step-26 with non-homogeneous Neumann 
boundary conditions and zero forcing function, among other changes. Until 
recently I had only actually run the code in 2D, though I have been 
continuing the "dimension independent" programming.

Yesterday I tried running a simple 1D case for the first time. I was 
already using VectorTools::create_boundary_rhs to apply the Neumann 
boundary conditions. Unfortunately I discovered that the 1D implementations 
of create_boundary_rhs all assert that this is an impossible operation in 

Not understanding why this is impossible, I began digging through the code 
a bit and thought I would write my own 1D implementation. I noticed that 
the code in the existing template should work correctly without any 
changes. So instead I simply copied and renamed the template, without the 
implementation asserting impossibility in 1D ( Assert (false, 
ExcImpossibleInDim(1)); ). My first test ran exactly as expected.

deal.II often asserts that something doesn't make sense or is impossible in 
a certain dimension. Sometimes I agree and sometimes I don't. This is the 
first time that it's just seemed completely wrong to me. What am I missing?

The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to dealii+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to