On Monday 05 April 2004 00:48, Thomas Bohn wrote: > Gibt es eigentlich schon neuere Informationen zum Fall, der Artikel > gibt nicht viel �ber die Hintergr�nde her.
Der Blogeintrag in http://jwz.livejournal.com/325502.html geht auf ein paar interessante Punkte ein, weil das Problem teilweise rekursive Natur hat: ----- "How does charging the kid help matters? A pedophile (if one is even involved) would just move on to another victim." ----- "ok, so would it be legal for someone else to posess the pictures that she took of herself? If yes, then kiddie porn is legal as long as it's self-shot, which could lead to people paying minors to take nude photos of themselves. If no, then presumably taking the images ought to be illegal too." ----- "It reminds me of the famous (but I guarantee: oversimplified) Texan situation where with 17 you may have sex but only with 18 years in your pocket can you watch porn." ----- "Where are the parents?!" ----- Cool. Can't wait to hear about the first 14-year-old boy charged with sex with a minor for masturbating. ----- can they release her name if she were convicted? She's a sex offender so they have to and the victim so they can't. ----- Kristian -- Jetzt auch: Kristian =?iso-8859-15?q?K=F6hntopp?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
