Quoting in full on purpose. Can DPL just tell the committee to do this on its own this once?
Richard Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity. On Dec 17, 2015 19:49, "Gunnar Wolf" <gw...@gwolf.org> wrote: > Didier 'OdyX' Raboud dijo [Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 06:07:22PM +0100]: > > Dear DebConf Team, > > > > Please be aware that the DebConf17 bids deadline has now passed and that > > there are two bidders: > > (...) > > I suggest to proceed this way: if there are blockers, for the two Bid > > teams or some DebConf Committee members, please voice them on the list > > now! We should really be able to decide on these dates before the end of > > this year (although, given [2], someone else should probably step in to > > actually decide on the dates). > > Hi all, > > As Didier said already replying to Steve, I am among the people > responding "yes" to the call. There is one bit that I do feel > important: We can reach a consensus as to which bid is more apt in our > eyes, but formally, we don't have a delegated body to make things > formal. According to the current delegation, the decision must be > taken between the Committee and the Chairs — Which don't currently > exist. > > So, we must come up with a decision on that regard. > > _______________________________________________ > Debconf-team mailing list > Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team > >
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
