On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 at 04:02, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[email protected]> wrote:
> regarding the contents, a bit of background: > firstly absolutely brilliant and essential idea, > today. the amount of damage done by RNA > vaccines is... well... humanity will never recover. > not an understatement. > > > https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2025/12/myocarditis-vaccine-covid.html > > one study showed 1 in 35 people have had their > hearts damaged by mRNA vaccination. > > Please avoid spreading misleading re-tellings of cutting-edge science. First of all the effect is detected in one person per 140,000 vaccinations. Both that finding and the later findings of that study are not really cleanly evaluable in vacuum - as the study also very clearly says, the same effect is far stronger for people that caught COVID itself. And with the way that COVID was circulating around the world for a long time before vaccines became available and how COVID infections very often happened with little to no symptoms, there was no way for the scientists in this study to exclude the possibility of people participating in the study catching COVID before first vaccination or between vaccinations. And if so, then the damage could be caused by the virus and just re-surface when the body is stressed by the vaccination later. The new thing they found is that any infection and any vaccination produces an immune system response that can highlight or impact pre-existing muscular conditions (including ones on heart muscles). With the effect of infections being at least 10 times stronger. This was true forever, but was simply never researched in detail before. It has nothing to do with mRNA vaccines as such, but does also apply to these vaccines. This also means that every year way more massive damage is being done with every wave of flu. We are simply not measuring that. And that failing to keep that in check with vaccination would increase the damage, not decrease it. Focusing on minimal (potential) damage from taking a mRNA vaccine while ignoring much higher damage from other sources is misleading. It's like warning against eating bananas due to radiation damage. What I would take as a constructive improvement is the awareness of cardiovascular problems of attendees. Our attendees are getting older every year. And there was a global COVID pandemic that has increased cardiovascular risks for nearly everyone. So having a clear protocol for identifying and dealing with cardiovascular events makes sense and could very well save lives and minds. -- Best regards, Aigars Mahinovs
