Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Ok. I am not moving i386 to straigh 2.2.19 right now, btw, since I'm > > pretty sure that kernel has issues. > > What kind of issues are you referring to? I checked and they are ok. Should I prepare new Potato boot-floppies with 2.2.19 for i386? That's the only change , aside from some documentation updates. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? David Whedon
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? David Whedon
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Martin Schulze
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Marcin Owsiany
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Philip Blundell
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- potato b-f 2.2.24 testing/building Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Wichert Akkerman
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Matt Kraai
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Erik Andersen
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Wichert Akkerman
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Wichert Akkerman
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo

