Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Ok. I am not moving i386 to straigh 2.2.19 right now, btw, since I'm > pretty sure that kernel has issues. What kind of issues are you referring to? Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? David Whedon
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? David Whedon
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Martin Schulze
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Marcin Owsiany
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Philip Blundell
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- potato b-f 2.2.24 testing/building Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Wichert Akkerman
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Matt Kraai
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Erik Andersen
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Wichert Akkerman
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Wichert Akkerman
- Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM? Adam Di Carlo

