* Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-26 01:45]: | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | >I agree, and deciding one way or the other on partman will help, since | >we can drop the other one to a low priority and out of memory. | | Well, I think partman rocks. Notably, a lot of people working on extra | architectures and subarchitectures appear to be hoping that partman takes | over, because it means that they just have to get libparted support for their | architecture, rather than making udebs of various and sundry tools and | supporting all their different interfaces in debconf. I think that's reason | enough to switch to it. Furthermore, it's actually pretty spiffy. :-)
Hmm. Are we shipping the "normal" architecture based
programs/applets/...(lvm2tools,mac-fidsk,...) also?
Bye
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Sauter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
