On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 08:11:42AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > What say you gentlemen? > > Based on what I know of partman and with newbie installation in mind, > I would definitely say "go fo partman as default on i386 and as an > option on other archs (except powerpc if it works OK for them?)".
Why do you say except powerpc ? Because it currently seems broken ? I would definitively want to go full partman for powerpc, it is the thing that makes more sense. Maybe it isn't even broken, just that i wasn't patient enough to wait for it to show something on the screen after a few minutes. > It's some time since I tested it. The only big problem I found was the > complexity of menus which sometimes could leave the user lost..... > > As Andr� wrote, making it the default for beta3 will immediately > trigger a lot of testing. I hope Anton is ready for this (we will all > help, of course, but basically, partman is his beast). And i will be willing to test all the stuff that needs testing for powerpc, and fix it if needed. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
