Hi, Colin Watson: > > > Is raw1394 needed? If so, I'll gladly add it. > > > > It isn't (neither 2.4 nor 2.6). > > Is it good for anything in the context of d-i (so is it worth leaving it > in)?
I don't think so. raw1394's only interface is /dev/raw1394; AFAIK
nothing in d-i accesses it, nor can I think of a good reason why
you'd want to.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
