On 22/01/08 at 08:11 -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:03:48AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> I'm not sure I understand ; you probably don't mean that getting SElinux >> into etch required not uploading nor maintaining coreutils? > > Well, people who didn't come charging in like assholes got a longer answer > and agreed that the reasons made sense.
Please try to avoid language like "assholes". I'm worried about the state of coreutils, which shows up very high in all metrics I can think of regarding package quality. First, you ignored my questions (on -qa@), then, you answered with agressive comments on this bugs. Shouldn't I be the one to be offensed? Could you please document those reasons, for example in this bug report, or in any another place that makes more sense? Or point us to the place where you already documented this? If the reasons make sense, no reason to hide them. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
