On 22/01/08 at 08:53 -0500, Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 02:51:11PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> So can you respond to the question: do you intend to setup a maintenance >> team and actually ask for help or do you want to sit on the package until >> hell freezes? > > Let's just say the latter since it doesn't look like rational discussion > will be possible. Maybe if you try again in a less confrontational fashion > we could have a more productive dialog.
OK, let's try to be on the positive side. I noticed that the status of coreutils since to be a bit problematic. Since some people are interested in helping, could you please describe: - how people could help you improving the situation (where should they start?) - what are your plans for lenny. do you plan to release with coreutils 5.97, or 6.X? If 6.X, what's your timeline? Do you know when coreutils 6.10 is expected to be released? - regarding bug triaging, should the efforts be targetted at cleaning up the status for coreutils 5.97 or 6.X? - regarding team maintainance, which organization would you like? would an svn repository in the collab-maint project work for you? Thank you, -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
