Your message dated Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:09:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Gnome (#154950) (was Re: Please organize the vote)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2002 10:26:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 31 05:26:20 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a1-2.ppp10.hrnet.fr (buxy.ouaza.com) [212.94.201.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17ZqgO-0006gZ-00; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 05:26:20 -0500
Received: by buxy.ouaza.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 140E121E30; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:25:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:25:47 +0200
From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gnome 2 transition
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Debian-CC: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: tech-ctte
Hi,
there's a nice flameware in debian-gtk-gnome about how to handle
the transition to Gnome2.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2002/debian-gtk-gnome-200207/threads.html
The problem :
-------------
Even though upstream have released Gnome 2.0 to the wide public, some
uystream people still think that Gnome 2 is not yet ready to be imposed to
our unstable users.
Current situtation :
--------------------
We have some core Gnome2 package in experimental. They have a
"2" suffix. We have gnome-terminal and sawfish for Gnome 2 in
unstable (without the "2" suffix). That means we also have some basic
Gnome2 libs in unstable (it's not a problem, they coexist nicely with
Gnome1 libs). But we don't have things like new panel and so on in
unstable. And it's those which are causing problems because they are not
made to coexist.
The conflicting solutions :
---------------------------
* Solution one :
Upload Gnome2 in unstable by replacing the old Gnome1.4 but make sure
that Gnome 1.4 is kept in sarge until G2D finalizes in unstable.
An announce on -devel-announce before doing it would be made to inform
people that to keep Gnome 1.4 they have to make sure to use sarge.
If Gnome 1.4 absolutely needs to be maintained in the mean time,
we can use testing-proposed-updates.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2002/debian-gtk-gnome-200207/msg00343.html
* Solution two :
Upload some Gnome2 packages in unstable with a new name (adding a "2"
suffix) so that unstable users can choose to install Gnome 2 or Gnome
1.4. Ask the user to test *2 packages. Rename them later and move them
to sarge.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-gtk-gnome/2002/debian-gtk-gnome-200207/msg00460.html
* Solution three :
This solution has not really been supported by anyone but I mention it here
for completeness because it may well turn out to be the best solution.
Work out Gnome 2 in a separate staging area (without any "2" suffix), and
move it to unstable one day (you have to define what is the criterion
for defining that "one day" because people won't agree otherwise).
That means that someone will have to handle that staging area. It also
means that G2D will be less tested on unpopular architectures.
A last note, I know that the tech-ctte takes quite some time to take a
decision, it would be great if you could try to do better this time ;-)
Thanks,
--
Rapha�l Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 154950-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2002 22:10:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 23 17:10:11 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.hrnet.fr [212.94.223.17]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 184Tha-00065r-00; Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:10:11 -0500
Received: from buxy.ouaza.com (A1-2.ppp10.hrnet.fr [212.94.201.10])
by mail.hrnet.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA21284;
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:50:17 +0200
Received: by buxy.ouaza.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D4F0021E48; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:09:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:09:36 +0200
From: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gnome (#154950) (was Re: Please organize the vote)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.hrnet.fr id AAA21284
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-13.4 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Le Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:04:11PM -0600, Bdale Garbee =E9crivait:
> > Therefore it seems to us that there is no longer a need for a
> > decision by the Committee. The bug report will be closed.
>=20
> I agree.
Duh. You really do not need to vote just to decide nothing. :-/
I'm the submitter of the bug, I'm closing it. Problem closed.
Cheers,
--=20
Rapha=EBl Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
