Ian Jackson writes ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]' etc. blackhole"):
> I hereby propose the following resolution:Oh, two of my test messages were delayed, and I have discovered that some of my assertions in my previous draft were false: > 4. Messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are currently filed in an unread mailbox. [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces (correctly). > FURTHERMORE, WE NOTE THAT > > 16. Mail for all unknown local parts @d.o is currently accepted. And [EMAIL PROTECTED] bounces too, so we don't need 16-18 either. Ian.
