On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > 6. We insist that [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be an alias for > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Ok, I just did that. > > thanks.
Well, I have made an error in this it seems. The rational for not having this sort of forward is pretty good. What I wanted to fix is the _blackhole_ around [EMAIL PROTECTED] that is used by the remote list auto-backuper, so I should have arranged for it to bounce. Please expect that configuration change will happen. > > Are you sure this is true? I didn't find any mention of a [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > address after a few mins of random grepping, so this might be a general > > black hole for all unmatched lists addresses. > I've sent a test mail and we'll see what happens to it. OK. You might also want to try [EMAIL PROTECTED] It is possible that mechanism just broke with the move to postfix as I recall it used some obscure qmail thingy. Listmaster would know for sure of course. Jason
