Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Your fundamental point seems to be that we should have no filtering > till after the list has distributed it (or, at least, no more than what > the other lists have). That any additional filtering should be on a > per-user basis.
Oh, and I should have come back to that point. I don't think it's good to have messages sent to a single address (eg [EMAIL PROTECTED]) get to some arbitrarily selected subset of the intended recipients depending on quite fallible heuristics. That will lead to broken-up discussions, people feeling they're being ignored, etc. That would be worse than the current situation, where people get upset but at least know their message didn't get through. Ian.
