On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 11:30:50AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Stephen Frost wrote: > > Generally I think the spam filtering done for all the other lists is > > pretty decent and takes case of most of it. I've got my own filtering > > in case something gets through (and for non-debian lists that don't have > > much filtering at all). > > I'm on debian-deity and debian-security-private and the signal/spam > ratio there is extremely low. For debian-security-private we'll probably > see 20 spams for every valid mail, if not worse. So I don't think the > current filtering comes close to being good enough. >
I thought debian-security-private had no spam filtering? It's not hosted on murphy anyway, so it has absolutly no relevance to the facts at hand here. Pasc
