On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 03:36:08PM -0500, david nicol wrote: > I've had perfectly acceptable results with a c/r system that > whitelists peer network addresses.
That kind of acceptability depends on context, and can change over time. > We could demand SPF listing or c/r, until junk all has SPF. SPF certainly introduces a level of accountability. It likely increases the cost for all spammers and increases the risk for illegal spammers, but that's not the same thing as eliminating spam. Short form: This approach might be good enough, but it might not be. -- Raul
