On 2/21/06, Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > Augh, we just agreed on a rotation, why a new one now? Downside to the > above: it schedules newbies and oldbies together rather than interspersing > them (Me then Andy; Bdale then Ian).
Because the dates on the original proposal were already invalidated by our procedures, before the proposal was accepted? Personally, I'm happy with either proposal, but because of this date sensitivity I'm standing by my earlier position on this issue: I'm willing to go along with whatever Ian thinks is best. -- Raul
