Steve Langasek writes ("Re: Technical committee chair rotation, draft
resolution"):
> Voting no, for the record. In addition to the points raised regarding the
> length of term, this resolution purports to be a "decision in advance" about
> who will be elected chair at various future points, which I don't believe is
> constitutionally valid.
If you believe that, then the whole thing is going to be far too much
hassle. We can't be having a faffy voting election thing every month
or two just to routinely elect the chairman.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
