On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Don Armstrong ([email protected]) [090811 23:04]: > > 1. Qmail is to be allowed into the archive without special > > preconditions. Ftpmaster should perform standard NEW processing for > > licensing, copyright, and general packaging issues as normal. > > As of now, qmail should definitly not be allowed into the archive. I > would rather prefer to state the issues that need to be changed and > that we already know as of now as part of the decision.
Would it be enough for these issues to be filed as RC bugs and the package be allowed into unstable, or is there a set of issues that need to be fixed before this happens? [If there is a set, what is it?] I'm fine with specifically spelling out the issues that we're already aware of needing to be fixed; I just think it's not fair to the prospective maintainer to have a moving set of things to fix for uploading to the archive. [It's perfectly reasonable to have a moving set of things to fix for propogation to testing, though.] Don Armstrong -- [On a trip back from collecting grass seeds in tropical bird stomachs and being thought by the customs agents to be transporting Marijuana.] "Anyone so square as to tell you they are transporting grass seeds is bound to be ok" -- Peter K. Klopfer _Seeds of Doubt_ Science 134:177 10 April 2009 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
