* Russ Allbery ([email protected]) [090814 04:49]: > Don Armstrong <[email protected]> writes: > > > Would it be enough for these issues to be filed as RC bugs and the > > package be allowed into unstable, or is there a set of issues that > > need to be fixed before this happens? [If there is a set, what is it?] > > > I'm fine with specifically spelling out the issues that we're already > > aware of needing to be fixed; I just think it's not fair to the > > prospective maintainer to have a moving set of things to fix for > > uploading to the archive. [It's perfectly reasonable to have a moving > > set of things to fix for propogation to testing, though.] > > I agree with Don on this, for the record.
I think it would be good to get rid of at least the "does delayed bounces" before upload. For all the other issues, RC bugs are an option. I also think that even in case we decide to allow qmail in that still gives the ftp-team the chance to remove it for having unhandled RC bugs for a too long time (that's in case the other issues are not fixed). Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
