Don Armstrong <[email protected]> writes: > Would it be enough for these issues to be filed as RC bugs and the > package be allowed into unstable, or is there a set of issues that > need to be fixed before this happens? [If there is a set, what is it?]
> I'm fine with specifically spelling out the issues that we're already > aware of needing to be fixed; I just think it's not fair to the > prospective maintainer to have a moving set of things to fix for > uploading to the archive. [It's perfectly reasonable to have a moving > set of things to fix for propogation to testing, though.] I agree with Don on this, for the record. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
