* Steve Langasek ([email protected]) [090830 09:09]: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 11:48:14PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * Bdale Garbee ([email protected]) [090825 21:09]: > > > So, let's have three choices. Steve's resolution, further discussion, > > > and a re-stated version of Goswin's option along these lines: > > > > agrees that there was insufficient justification to remove the > > > ia32-libs-tools package from the archive. The ftp team is > > > therefore directed to, within one week of the conclusion of this > > > vote, either reinstate the package to the archive, or petition > > > the technical committee to reconsider this issue by > > > communicating further justification for their original decision. > > > How about: > > ... archive, or provide the maintainer and the technical committee > > further justification for their original decision. In that case the > > committee will make another final decision on this topic, considering > > the justifications. > > Is there an agreement about which of these to put on the ballot, or should I > include each of these proposals separately?
Bdales and mine shouldn't be both on the ballot - Bdale, which one should be on it? Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
