* Russ Allbery ([email protected]) [120319 05:10]: > Ian Jackson <[email protected]> writes: > > Andreas Barth writes: > > >> As I got no further comments from other people of the tech ctte, this > >> can only mean that everyone agrees with this version, or is not > >> interessted. > > > I think the version I quote (as amended) is the best. > > I agree with that proposal and think it would be a worthwhile amendment. > I'd be happy to see someone drive this forward. > > Andreas, did you want us to vote on whether to bring this forward as a GR, > or was this bug more in the way of a medium for discussion?
I'd like to vote on it, because I think it's better for the GR if the tech ctte decided to see these changes implemented. > I would be happy to go forward with the GR to fix the supermajority rule > by itself, since I think it's uncontroversial and could be easily passed. Good. In that case I think we should just call for votes, and vote it, and do the other topics in different GRs? Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
