* Ian Jackson ([email protected]) [140221 13:41]: > Andreas Barth writes ("Bug#727708: init system coupling etc."): > > Russ Allbery ([email protected]) [140219 19:24]: > > So I propose to change the text: > > > > > > The Technical Committee offers no advice at this time on requirements > > > or package dependencies on specific init systems after the jessie > > > release. There are too many variables at this point to know what the > > > correct course of action will be. > > > > to > > | The Technical Committee offers no advice regarding sysvinit > > | compatibility at this time after the jessie release. There are too > > | many variables at this point to know what the correct course of action > > | will be. > > > > (the empty line above is there by purpose, i.e. it also merges this > > paragraph with the previous one) > > Looking at Russ's draft, he has already made an effectively identical > change. Russ's wording is: > > The Technical Committee offers no advice at this time on sysvinit > support beyond the jessie release. There are too many variables at > this point to know what the correct course of action will be. > > This differs from yours in the placement of "at this time" (see my > previous mail) and in that it uses "beyond the jessie release" rather > than "after the jessie release". These don't seem to change the > meaning much for me but improve the way it reads. > > You may wish to adopt Russ's wording.
I do. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
