On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 08:57:06PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Christoph Hellwig: > > >> Greg Hudson contributes an interesting viewpoint: > >> > >> <http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/bitkeeper.whynot> > > > > It's completely unfounded bullshit. Whether you prefer a pyramid > > or lots of commiters style organization is pretty much a personal > > or rather community organizational issue. Both have their up- > > and downsides. > > Of course, but if I look at Linux release management (which is still > somewhat problematic, as countless vendor-specific patches can attest) > and cursory pre-integration peer review, I think he has a point.
While I agree that Linus is a very bad release manager that doesn't have anything to do with the developmen model. > Is there *any* large project using a pyramid model and produces > regular, high-quality releases which are used mostly unchanged by > distributors? I don't know about any single large project that produces releases that are used mostly unchanged by distributors. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]