Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 06 Oct 2005, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Unlimited distribution isn't the problem. Modification and >> redistribution of modified versions is the problem, and that >> restriction was apparently > If the IETF allows modified versions that are *RENAMED*, then it would > meet the DFSG. They can even restrict the renaming to "something that > makes it clear that this is not an RFC, STD, <insert other IETF acronyms > here>"... Right, I know. Apparently it was intentional on the part of the IETF to not even allow that. Don't look at me; I think it's a stupid decision. I'm not saying we can't get them to change it, or that we shouldn't try, or anything else that discouraging. I'm just saying that it isn't solely a misunderstanding or lack of clarity; there really is an underlying disagreement here. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]