On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
IMHO, drop the "Meta" prefix, then. There is no shame in doing so.
Well, just dropping the meta is a little bit to simple. There is an extensive documentation about the Custom Debian Distribution techniques and the tools that are used at http://people.debian.org/~tille/cdd/ It makes IMHO no sense to invent just another prefix in front of "package" instead of "meta" just because there might be some additional (optional) information inside these packages which is not contained in debian/control, but reasonably is called meta information for the relevant task. It makes no sense to play wording games just because there are some people who think that the definition we gave on http://people.debian.org/~tille/cdd/ch-technology.en.html#s-metapackages does not fit into the scope they would give the name "meta package". Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]