On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:57:48AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > > A possible concern is people seeing /run and thinking "ah, there's a > > directory I can use for stuff", and having it be used instead of > > /var/run or $TMPDIR or /var/lib or /var/cache for things it's not > > appropriate for. > I think that everyone agrees that /run is to be used only for those very > few purposes for which /var/run cannot be used. If there are worries > about abuse then I would suggest the addition of a sentence to Policy > forbidding such abuse.
Developers have been known not to be completely familiar with policy, but it's admins and upstream programmers that I'm particularly thinking of. Cheers, aj
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
