On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:45:16PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > 2.6.8 is not an optimal kernel, but largely due to timing (i.e. SATA just > starting to get implemented).
The real question (IMHO) is probably whether it would be possible to get newer kernels into volatile. I'd guess "probably not", given that stuff like udev tends to break every other release, but it's a tempting thought -- the sarge machine here seems to run miles better with a 2.6.14 backport (yay for backports.org) than it ever did with 2.6.8 (which seems to have a really really unstable USB layer). /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
