Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Persuade Heimdal upstream to provide an soname that uniquely identifies > this library in the face of other, pre-existing libgssapi packages, and > barring that, add a Debian-specific soname component to it?
That's a bit unfair to Heimdal given that their GSSAPI library predates the UMich library by many years. > Or if the libraries are actually fully ABI-compatible, perhaps the two > packages could have the same Provides that could be used in the shlibs? This may work. They both implement the same standard. Although they're not *fully* ABI-compatible, since Heimdal exposes some additional symbols that are useful for users who are doing Kerberos, so it probably won't work as-is. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
