Am 9. November 2026 13:14:53 UTC schrieb Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]>: >Quoting Tobias Frost (2026-11-09 12:26:38) >> Am 9. November 2026 08:38:41 UTC schrieb Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]>: >> >Quoting Ansgar ๐ (2026-11-09 09:21:29) >> >I have abosolutely no idea who in the Debian project you are describing >> >as wanting to kick anyone else out of Debian. >> >> Am 9. November 2026 08:38:41 UTC schrieb Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]>: >> >Quoting Ansgar ๐ (2026-11-09 09:21:29) >> >I have abosolutely no idea who in the Debian project you are describing >> >as wanting to kick anyone else out of Debian. >> >> Ian was directly calling for disciplinary action, at least that's how I read >> his remarks. I'm unfortunately also failing to see much evidence of "Assume >> good faith" towards the DFSG Team in his message, but maybe that's just me >> not being a native English speaker. > >Yes, Ian demanded our leader to "at the very least very strongly >criticise" which I fail to read as Ian wanting to kick anyone out of >Debian. > >For the record and avoidance of any possible doubt, I do not wish for >or demand that anyone be kicked out of Debian. Not now nor ever before. > > > - Jonas >
I read Ian's remarks differently. Asking who should be referred to CT or DAM, even under the guise of a hypothetical question, is in my reading clearly suggesting disciplinary action. I also find his choice of wording quite telling: the hypothetical framing and repeated rhetorical questions give his accusations a veneer of procedural neutrality, while the implications are anything but neutral. Combined with his categorical assertion that this is a conduct violation and his demand that Sruthi strongly criticise the team, I find it difficult to read this as merely a good-faith appeal for accountability. But, again, perhaps that's just me, as a non-native English speaker.
