Le Sun, Nov 08, 2026 at 06:18:42PM +0100, Matthias Geiger a écrit :
This is a conduct violation. It's not just a disagreement about the
merits of LLMs. We had a vote, and what the DFSG Team are doing is a
gross violation of the decision in that vote.
Full ack, and thanks for putting it that way. We had a vote on that,
and while I (obviously) am not happy with the outcome, I respect it,
since this is the Debian way of deciding things. I would expect other
DDs adhere to the same. As evidenced in this thread, this will
increase maintainer dissatisfaction.
I think that you are overstretching the results of the GR.
Option 1 was clearly intented to take a decision that is binding to all
the Debian members and contributors, and its proposers made it clear.
To the best of my knowledge all other options were written in reaction
to option 1. The people who wrote these options never expressed the
opinion that they would have started a GR if option 1 had not been
proposed.
Whatever option won, it is the result of rejecting option 1.
Discussions on this list will not settle on the interpretation of the
result of the GR. But you if you think that apologies can not be
accepted and disciplinary action is warranted, you can:
- Ask the authors of the winning option to clarify what they tried to
achieve in general, and if they think that the DFSG team is not
resepcting the GR.
- Ask the Debian Secretary for advice on interpretation.
- Ask the people in charge of disciplining members.
- Start a new GR to repel the team or clarify the result of the
previous GR (I do not recommend).
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tooting from work, https://fediscience.org/@charles_plessy
Tooting from home, https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy
