On Nov 9, 2026 05:09, Maytham Alsudany <[email protected]> wrote:
> The new system is clearly a "large-scale or automated" project action.


It is not clear to me. The fact an LLM review is made on each upload is an 
automation. But it isn't making any decision, and it is optional to read the 
output.

 
> But the DFSG Team members who set it up *didn't* consult anyone, let
> alone get *consensus* as the GR demands (and our longstanding policy,
> and the Constitution, expect).

What is clear to me, is that some project member like you or Ian are 
over-reacting, and trying to find legal grounds when there's none available.


cheers,


Thomas Goirand (zigo)




Reply via email to