Osamu Aoki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] > This is better. Also, convention on pt_BR is strange. We do not say > en_US while we can say en_GB.
Why is 'pt_BR' strange? We also have 'pt_PT' so we need language and country for the complete locale. And I don't see anything wrong with 'en_US'. Thanks, Ardo -- Ardo van Rangelrooij home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] home page: http://people.debian.org/~ardo GnuPG fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
