-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 06-10-2004 18:22, Ralf Gesel|ensetter wrote: | Dear Gavin, | | thank you for addressing this topic. From my experiences, I'd plea for one | LTSP server per room - unless there is only adult internet users using thin | clients. I have some pupils who make fun of running top and then competing | for the hightest CPU share. As we have a dual processor machine, there is | still headroom, but sometimes they manage to slow down things. | | Personally, my knowledge of linux plus root access is enough to tell who does | it, and to kill their processes. But if they were in different rooms (or the | teacher is no admin), there might be problems. | | More often, however, I feel it is this ancient kde2 causing timing problems. | Kind of stepping onto its own feet (if this saying is any international). | | Am Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2004 16:40 schrieb Gavin McCullagh: | |> This would |>create stadard iproute throttling rules which would cause the ltsp client |>to constrict it's own bandwidth usage to something reasonable/tunable (like |>say 4MB/sec default). | | | Bandwidth throttling sounds sound to me - should be on average, however (to | admit peaks). If there is such thing - why not! The question is, of course, | where the real bottleneck is - with some animations it (still) might be | bandwidth (until NX), if it is the CPU, have multiple processors. Considering | a 1GBit uplink for ltspserver (provided a supporting switch), could be worth | a try, too (ten times the bandwith!).
Sounds like WRR (Debian binary package kernel-patch-wrr) to me:
~ The WRR scheduler is an extension to the Traffic Control/network ~ bandwidth management part of the Linux 2.2 and 2.4 kernels. ~ The scheduler was developed to support distributing bandwidth ~ on a shared Internet connection fairly between local machines. ~ . ~ * As a default all local machines will get equally much ~ of the bandwidth if they have sufficient demand. This ~ is obtained by doing so-called weighted round robin (wrr) ~ scheduling. ~ * It is possible to give machines transferring much data ~ over a long or short period of time less bandwidth. ~ * It can work on a bridge, a router or on a firewall. ~ * Supports accounting locally generated masqueraded packets ~ to the correct local machine. ~ * On the WRR home page an extension is available which ~ includes patches for Squid and the Nec socks5 proxy servers ~ so that proxied packets can also be accounted to the ~ correct local machine. ~ * Includes a configuration file based set of scripts that ~ will setup everything without changing your basic network ~ setup. The scripts will allow you to shape both incoming ~ and outgoing traffic.
~ - Jonas
- -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
~ - Enden er n�r: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBZDwcn7DbMsAkQLgRAkYKAJ0Q8vhVMWrZC31zDKgKjn6EpShZygCePkTz YowwRzWPie+w11RBdXoLkUc= =ccLZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

