Akira TAGOH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2002 22:34:20 -0400 (EDT), >>>>> "JH" == Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JH> Can someone shed some light on what the plan is here? Are > JH> we getting libgtk+ 2.0 rebuilt against png3 or not? If so I'll > JH> rebuild my packages locally until the NMUs all work through > JH> but I don't want to waste a bunch of time to find out after > JH> I'm done that we are reverting to png2 after all. Thanks in > JH> advance for any clarifications. > I don't want to revert the dependency of GTK+2.0 to > libpng2. because when I noticed this plan on this list, > there are no objection about the shifting to libpng3. so I > thought that I got the agreements. And we should go forward, forget libpng2, the new version is libpng3. Christian
