Christian,
Thanks. I missed that one. Do we know what the view is upstream
in the GNOME project on imlib? If it is considered a package
slated for eventual depreciation perhaps we should look more at
fixing those programs that still require it under glib/gtk+2.0
to use whatever the alternatives are instead. The same would apply
to kde 3.0.x of course.
Jack- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Christian Marillat
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Jack Howarth
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Christian Marillat
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Jack Howarth
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Jack Howarth
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Bastien Nocera
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Christian Marillat
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Bastien Nocera
- libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Jack Howarth
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Christian Marillat
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Jack Howarth
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Jack Howarth
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Bastien Nocera
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Christian Marillat
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Jack Howarth
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Christian Marillat
- Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we Jack Howarth

