On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 06:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox: > > I believe that these packages should be in the Provides line for the > > ghc-doc package: > > > > > > libghc-binary-doc > > libghc-haskeline-doc > > libghc-terminfo-doc > > libghc-xhtml-doc > > > > > > ghc-doc contains a .haddock file for each of them. > > I wonder if we shouldn’t rather not ship these libraries with GHC, and > instead package them separately. That way, we can update them > independently. > > It seems to me (other than binary) those libraries are not actually provided by the ghc package, the .haddock files just snuck into the ghc-doc package.
