On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:42 AM, David Fox <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Joachim Breitner <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Am Freitag, den 11.07.2014, 06:03 -0700 schrieb David Fox: >> > I believe that these packages should be in the Provides line for the >> > ghc-doc package: >> > >> > >> > libghc-binary-doc >> > libghc-haskeline-doc >> > libghc-terminfo-doc >> > libghc-xhtml-doc >> > >> > >> > ghc-doc contains a .haddock file for each of them. >> >> I wonder if we shouldn’t rather not ship these libraries with GHC, and >> instead package them separately. That way, we can update them >> independently. >> >> It seems to me (other than binary) those libraries are not actually > provided by the ghc package, the .haddock files just snuck into the ghc-doc > package. > > Ignore that, I was looking at an old build of ghc.
