Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 16:45:22 -0400 From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've Cc'd alpha list to ask about the package name currently involved (libc6.1) will that need to change to 6.2? What about libc0.2 for hurd? Keep it libc0.2 for the Hurd. There will be a dependency issue though. People will need a recent enough version of the hurd package for glibc 2.2. AFAIK there isn't a Debian package yet that is recent enough. It's probably best to coordinate this with Marcus Brinkmann. Oh, and by the way, the libstdc++.so versioning madness isn't applied for the Hurd :-). There's definitely no reason for a seperate libstdc++ package for glibc 2.2 on the Hurd. Mark
