> > Depend: hurd (>= 20000803) > Looks more appropriate, we don't want to force removal of hurd because of a conflict resolution.
> > Oh, and by the way, the libstdc++.so versioning madness isn't applied > > for the Hurd :-). There's definitely no reason for a seperate > > libstdc++ package for glibc 2.2 on the Hurd. Why does hurd not have this problem? Does it have libstdc++? What is the soname of the library? If it's based on the libc version, like all the rest, then it will have that problem, just like everyone else. -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
