On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 03:26:56AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:19:08PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > Oh, and by the way, the libstdc++.so versioning madness isn't applied > > > > for the Hurd :-). There's definitely no reason for a seperate > > > > libstdc++ package for glibc 2.2 on the Hurd. > > > > Why does hurd not have this problem? Does it have libstdc++? What is the > > soname of the library? If it's based on the libc version, like all the > > rest, then it will have that problem, just like everyone else. > > ulysses:/gnu/lib# objdump -p libstdc++.so.2.10.0 | grep SONAME > SONAME libstdc++.so.2.10.0 > > The Hurd has not the long history of linux libc conversions, so we don't > need to carry the same amount of cruft with us. The libc soname is not > included in libstdc++ at all.
<jealous>Damn, why can't this be the case with non-hurd?</jealous> -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
