On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 12:42:03AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 16:45:22 -0400 > From: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I've Cc'd alpha list to ask about the package name currently involved > (libc6.1) will that need to change to 6.2? What about libc0.2 for hurd? > > Keep it libc0.2 for the Hurd. There will be a dependency issue > though. People will need a recent enough version of the hurd > package for glibc 2.2. AFAIK there isn't a Debian package yet that is > recent enough. It's probably best to coordinate this with Marcus > Brinkmann.
I just uploaded one, and it will be installed tomorrow (until then, check http://incoming.debian.org). It will be sufficient to Depend: hurd (>= 20000803) or, alternatively, Conflict: hurd (<= 20000726) I just don't know what is better in the long run. > Oh, and by the way, the libstdc++.so versioning madness isn't applied > for the Hurd :-). There's definitely no reason for a seperate > libstdc++ package for glibc 2.2 on the Hurd. *snigger* :) Thanks, Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org for public PGP Key [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID 36E7CD09 http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
