John Smith, le Wed 20 Jul 2011 01:12:00 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Svante Signell
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I think reboot or halt is better, but still fs checks are happening when
> > they shouldn't.
> >
> Hrm. Good point. Dont want no bogus fsck messages. Also, maybe
> 'shutdown' should be aliased to a 'use halt instead message', or just
> alias 'shutdown' to plain 'halt' ?

Will most probably be rejected by the sysvinit maintainer. Better
simply fix using SYSV on hurd-i386.

Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to